News

Featured Articles

Latest News

October 29, 2015
$125 Million Settlement Reached in Warner Chilcott Whistleblower Lawsuit

On October 29, 2015, pharmaceutical manufacturer Warner Chilcott agreed to plead guilty to a felony healthcare fraud scheme and to pay $125 million to resolve kickback allegations. Seeger Weiss LLP represented the two former Warner Chilcott drug sales representatives who blew the whistle and brought this historic healthcare fraud whistleblower lawsuit forward. According to the […]

Read More
April 30, 2015
Seeger Weiss LLP Statement on Final Approval of NFL Concussion Settlement

Philadelphia, PA –Christopher A. Seeger, Co-Lead Counsel for the retired NFL player plaintiffs in In Re: National Football League Players Concussion Injury Litigation, responded today to the Court’s granting of final approval of the settlement in the NFL concussion litigation this afternoon: “Nearly four years ago, retired NFL players embarked on a mission that many […]

Read More
June 26, 2014
Update on NFL Concussion Litigation

NFL, CLASS COUNSEL JOINT STATEMENT ON FILING OF REVISED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The National Football League and counsel for the retired player plaintiffs announced today a revised settlement agreement in the NFL concussion litigation pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. In the revised agreement the NFL’s obligations under the monetary […]

Read More
September 6, 2013
Funds Uncapped – Revised Settlement in NFL Concussion Litigation

Christopher A. Seeger, serving as co-lead counsel for former NFL players and lead negotiator in the highly-publicized concussion lawsuit has reached an uncapped settlement with the NFL. The National Football League and counsel for the retired player plaintiffs announced today a revised settlement agreement in the NFL concussion litigation pending in the U.S. District Court […]

Read More
April 5, 2013
A Win for Consumers in Mandatory Arbitration Cases: Recent Decision in Toyota Hybrid Brake Case

On January 30, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision in the multidistrict Toyota Motor Corp. Hybrid Brake Marketing Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, holding that the plaintiffs’ consumer fraud claims against Toyota, relating to faulty brakes in 2010 Prius models and 2010 Lexus hybrid HS […]

Read More
April 3, 2013
How Companies Break the Law and Escape Liability Through Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

Supreme Court decisions are often puzzling. The Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. Concepción is particularly baffling in the world of consumer rights law. In Concepción, Justice Antonin Scalia held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), which favors contractual arbitration clauses, preempts state consumer protection laws. Let’s break down exactly what that means… Concepción in a Nutshell In Concepción, customers of […]

Read More
Load More