Plaintiffs Win Preliminary Approval of $1.51 Billion Settlement With Syngenta

Ridgefield Park, N.J. – Today plaintiffs, in the litigation against Syngenta related to its marketing and commercialization of Agrisure Viptera and Agrisure Duracade corn seeds, were granted preliminary approval of a settlement with Syngenta before the United States District Court in the District of Kansas (MDL no. 2591). It is the largest agricultural litigation settlement in U.S. history. The settlement […]

April 10, 2018

Settlement With Syngenta

Ridgefield Park, N.J. – Today plaintiffs, in the litigation against Syngenta related to its marketing and commercialization of Agrisure Viptera and Agrisure Duracade corn seeds, were granted preliminary approval of a settlement with Syngenta before the United States District Court in the District of Kansas (MDL no. 2591). It is the largest agricultural litigation settlement in U.S. history.

The settlement with Syngenta was reached in September of 2017, finalized in February 2018, and filed for approval on March 12, 2018. The terms of the settlement were agreed upon only after years of hard fought litigation and negotiations between Syngenta and various plaintiff groups. Syngenta will contribute $1.51 billion dollars to a settlement fund, used to make payments to be allocated among eligible corn farmers, grain handling facilities and ethanol production facilities who fall within the settlement class and to cover the costs of administering the settlement, including any court-approved award of fees to plaintiffs’ counsel, in exchange for a classwide release of all claims against Syngenta related to the launch of Agrisure Viptera and Agrisure Duracade. The $1.51 billion dollar settlement resolves thousands of pending cases against Syngenta. The settlement does not constitute an admission by either side concerning the merits of the parties’ allegations and defenses.

Now that approval has been granted, plaintiffs’ lawyers will begin notifying potential claimants about the settlement and how to submit a claim for compensation. The amount received by any individual claimant will vary depending on the individual claimant’s farming, grain handling, or ethanol production operations and will be determined through a claims process.

Seeger Weiss partner Chris Seeger served as a court-appointed member of the Plaintiffs’ Settlement Committee and Stephen Weiss served as a member of the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee. Seeger and Weiss were accompanied in their efforts by partner Dion Kekatos, who was centrally involved in the multidistrict litigation and settlement briefing.

Notwithstanding claims relating to this product, the drug/medical device remains approved by the U.S. FDA.

Related News

April 5, 2024
Lawdragon Names Four Seeger Weiss Partners to 500 Global Plaintiff Lawyers

Seeger Weiss is pleased to announce that Lawdragon has recognized four of the firm’s partners, including co-founders Chris Seeger and Stephen Weiss, as well as partners David Buchanan and Jennifer Scullion, on the 2024 Lawdragon 500 Global Plaintiff Lawyers. According to Lawdragon, this year’s honorees “stand tall as a global movement bringing justice across borders. […]

Read More
March 13, 2024
The Legal 500 recognizes Seeger Weiss as a Top Firm and Inducts Co-Founder Chris Seeger into the Hall of Fame

Seeger Weiss is pleased to announce that the firm was named one of The Legal 500 Top Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Action Firms. Co-founder Chris Seeger was also named to The Legal 500 Plaintiff Hall of Fame. These esteemed recognitions showcase Seeger Weiss’ and Chris Seeger’s unwavering dedication to ensuring corporate responsibility and […]

Read More
February 29, 2024
Seeger Weiss’ Founding Partner Chris Seeger and Senior Partner Dave Buchanan discussed the 3M settlement and other key wins with Law360

Seeger Weiss was recently recognized as Law360’s 2023 Product Liability Group of the Year, after the firm secured multiple litigation victories, including a groundbreaking $6 billion deal to settle the massive litigation brought by veterans and service members, who claimed that 3M’s combat earplugs caused harm to their hearing. Between 1999 and 2015, 3M knowingly […]

Read More