Jury Finds Meta and YouTube Liable in Landmark California Social Media Addiction Trial

A California jury has found Meta and YouTube negligent in designing platforms that harmed a young user, ordering Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube to pay $1.8 million in combined compensatory and punitive damages.

March 26, 2026

Meta & YouTube Verdict

A California jury has found Meta and YouTube negligent in designing platforms that harmed a young user, ordering Meta to pay $4.2 million and YouTube to pay $1.8 million in combined compensatory and punitive damages, in what is being called a landmark verdict in social media addiction litigation.

Seeger Weiss Founding Partner Christopher Seeger serves as Counsel to the Co-Lead Counsel and Settlement Counsel in the Social Media Adolescent Addiction / Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, representing thousands of children and families harmed by social media platforms. The verdict comes from a parallel California-based federal case and is a significant sign of strength for the MDL, which is expected to go to trial this year.

The jury, seated in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County, found that addictive design features, including infinite scroll, algorithmic recommendations, and autoplay video, caused anxiety, depression, and body dysmorphia in the plaintiff, now 20 years old.

The case is one of thousands of lawsuits filed against social media companies by teenagers, families, school districts, and state attorneys general. TikTok and Snap settled with the plaintiff before trial. The verdict validates that platform design choices can constitute personal injury and is expected to shape similar cases in the MDL headed to trial this year.

“This verdict is a testament to the courage of the plaintiff and her family, and to the exceptional work of Mark Lanier and the trial team that brought her story to light,” said Seeger. “The evidence is clear: Meta and YouTube knowingly designed features in their platforms to hook young users and then looked the other way as those choices caused profound harm to children. These companies have an opportunity to make meaningful changes to how their platforms operate, and resolve claims from the thousands of children, families, and communities they have harmed. Until they do, this is the outcome they can expect for the foreseeable future.”

Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter.

Related News

July 28, 2026
Seeger Weiss Named Pharmaceutical Litigation Practice Group of the Year at the National Law Journal’s 2026 Elite Trial Lawyers Awards

Seeger Weiss has been named as Pharmaceutical Litigation Practice Group of the Year at the National Law Journal’s 2026 Elite Trial Lawyers Awards. This honor is reflects to the Seeger Weiss team’s efforts throughout the entire Pharmaceutical Litigation practice area, but specifically the firm’s work on the GLP-1 RA and Depo-Provera litigations. Partner Parvin Aminolroaya […]

Read More
July 28, 2026
Plaintiffs Reach Uncapped Global Settlement With J&J, Company to Pay Minimum of $5.8 Billion to Resolve Talc Litigation After More Than a Decade

The Plaintiffs’ Negotiation Committee in multi-district litigation 2738 (District of New Jersey), with the support and endorsement of the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee and the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, announces today that it has reached a historic uncapped global settlement with J&J, Company to pay a minimum $5.8 billion settlement to resolve all current and pending talcum […]

Read More
June 29, 2026
Seeger Weiss Earns Tier 1 Ranking in the 2026 Legal 500 USA Guide

Seeger Weiss is proud to announce that the firm has been selected for a Tier 1 ranking in the 2026 Legal 500 USA Guide in the Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Action: Plaintiff category. Founding Partner Christopher Seeger was selected for inclusion in the category’s Hall of Fame in recognition of his continued leadership […]

Read More