Skip to content

Court Invalidates Pension Plan Amendment That Cut Benefits of Former Bakery Workers

On June 7, 2012, the Honorable Vincent L. Briccetti of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an opinion in In re Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension Fund Pension Plan, granting Seeger Weiss LLP’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and denied the Defendants’ cross-motion for […]

June 14, 2012

On June 7, 2012, the Honorable Vincent L. Briccetti of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an opinion in In re Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension Fund Pension Plan, granting Seeger Weiss LLP’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and denied the Defendants’ cross-motion for the same relief.

At issue in the case is the legality of a pension plan amendment that became effective July 1, 2010 and which affects tens of thousands of present and former employees of unionized bakeries. The amendment eliminated the availability of “Golden 80” and “Golden 90” early retirement pension benefits for those plan participants who are no longer in covered employment. Those benefits provided a full pension to those workers whose combined age and years of service reached 80 or 90, respectively.

On behalf of the plaintiffs and a proposed nationwide class, attorneys from Seeger Weiss argued that the 2010 amendment eliminating Golden 80 and 90 pensions to former workers who were eligible for such benefits violated the prohibition in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) against cutbacks of vested and accrued benefits. Even though ERISA specifically protects early retirement benefits, the Defendants argued that the amendment was lawful, principally on the basis of legislative history surrounding a 1984 amendment to the statute. Judge Briccetti, however, agreed with the plaintiffs, and held that the amendment violates ERISA’s so-called “anti-cutback” provision.

In the Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund Pension Plan litigation, Seeger Weiss LLP was appointed Interim Co-Lead Counsel in July 2011 on behalf of 25 plaintiffs in two consolidated cases who were formerly employed in unionized bakery positions. The litigation is led by Seeger Weiss partners Christopher A. Seeger and Diogenes P. Kekatos.

Related News

March 14, 2023
Seeger Weiss Obtains $10 Million Settlement In Whistleblower Lawsuit Against Medical Device Company Stimwave

New York, NY– Today, the Department of Justice announced a $10 million settlement with Florida-based medical device company Stimwave, and a criminal indictment charging former CEO Laura Perryman in connection with a scheme to create and sell a non-functioning dummy medical device for implantation into patients suffering from chronic pain.  The scheme resulted in millions […]

Read More
February 28, 2023
Eleven Seeger Weiss Partners Selected For Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers List

Seeger Weiss is proud to announce that eleven of the firm’s partners were selected for Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers list for 2023. This list celebrates attorneys who are “tenacious advocates and dogged pursuers of justice,” a description fitting for these accomplished members of the Seeger Weiss team. Founding partners Chris Seeger and Stephen […]

Read More
February 9, 2023
Former NFL Players File Class Action Lawsuit Against NFL Disability Plans, Board, Commissioner Roger Goodell For Systemic Bias Against Disabled Players

New data suggest “neutral” NFL-hired doctors who deny more claims receive higher compensation. Baltimore, MD – Former NFL players today filed a class action lawsuit against The NFL Player Disability & Survivor Benefit Plan and NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefits Plan (the Plan), the Disability Board that administers the Plan, and each of the […]

Read More