Skip to content

Court Invalidates Pension Plan Amendment That Cut Benefits of Former Bakery Workers

On June 7, 2012, the Honorable Vincent L. Briccetti of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an opinion in In re Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension Fund Pension Plan, granting Seeger Weiss LLP’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and denied the Defendants’ cross-motion for […]

June 14, 2012

On June 7, 2012, the Honorable Vincent L. Briccetti of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an opinion in In re Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension Fund Pension Plan, granting Seeger Weiss LLP’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings and denied the Defendants’ cross-motion for the same relief.

At issue in the case is the legality of a pension plan amendment that became effective July 1, 2010 and which affects tens of thousands of present and former employees of unionized bakeries. The amendment eliminated the availability of “Golden 80” and “Golden 90” early retirement pension benefits for those plan participants who are no longer in covered employment. Those benefits provided a full pension to those workers whose combined age and years of service reached 80 or 90, respectively.

On behalf of the plaintiffs and a proposed nationwide class, attorneys from Seeger Weiss argued that the 2010 amendment eliminating Golden 80 and 90 pensions to former workers who were eligible for such benefits violated the prohibition in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) against cutbacks of vested and accrued benefits. Even though ERISA specifically protects early retirement benefits, the Defendants argued that the amendment was lawful, principally on the basis of legislative history surrounding a 1984 amendment to the statute. Judge Briccetti, however, agreed with the plaintiffs, and held that the amendment violates ERISA’s so-called “anti-cutback” provision.

In the Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund Pension Plan litigation, Seeger Weiss LLP was appointed Interim Co-Lead Counsel in July 2011 on behalf of 25 plaintiffs in two consolidated cases who were formerly employed in unionized bakery positions. The litigation is led by Seeger Weiss partners Christopher A. Seeger and Diogenes P. Kekatos.

Related News

December 1, 2022
Seeger Weiss now accepting applicants for 2023 Diversity Fellowship

Seeger Weiss LLP announced today that the application period for the firm’s 2023 Diversity Fellowship is now open. Seeger Weiss is committed to providing an inclusive, equitable workplace where team members from all backgrounds can thrive and grow. We believe that diversity makes workplaces, institutions, and our world stronger, smarter, more resilient, and more just. […]

Read More
November 11, 2022
Chris Seeger appointed co-lead counsel in In Re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation

Seeger Weiss is proud to announce founder Chris Seeger has been appointed to serve as co-lead counsel in the In Re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation by the honorable Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Seeger was one of three lawyers selected to lead the multidistrict litigation pending in the Northern District of California, […]

Read More
November 4, 2022
Seeger Weiss founding partner Chris Seeger helps negotiate $10 billion agreements with Walgreens and CVS in National Prescription Opiate Litigation

Seeger Weiss founding partner Chris Seeger along with partner Jennifer Scullion helped lead the National Prescription Opiate Litigation team in negotiations with Walgreens and CVS that culminated in over $10 billion in settlement agreements to help communities across the country ravaged by the opioid epidemic. In addition to Seeger and Scullion, negotiations were led by […]

Read More