Drug & Toxic Injury
Personal Injury
Asbestos
Class Actions
Securities Fraud
Commercial Litigation
Gulf Oil Spill
Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella
Accutane
Hydroxycut
Category : Class Certification
Is Rule 23(f) Appellate Review of Class Certification Rulings Becoming at Long Last a Reality for Plaintiffs?
In 1998, the Supreme Court adopted subdivision (f) to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, permitting interlocutory review by a court of appeals of a district court’s decision granting or denying a motion for class certification under Rule 23. The adoption of the rule came after years of agitation, primarily from the defense bar and business interests, which had complained that class certification rulings often had a coercive effect on class action defendants by placing “insurmountable pressure” on them to settle, even where a plaintiff’s case was weak on the merits, and that it was therefore necessary to provide immediate appellate review so that defendants aren’t coerced by faulty class certification rulings into settling meritless claims.
Courts Breathing New Life into Consumer-Oriented Tobacco Claims
In recent years, while many favorable outcomes had been reported in personal injury cases stemming from smoking-related ailments, e.g., Boeken v. Philip Morris Inc., 127 Cal. App. 4th 1640, 26 Cal. Rptr. 3d 638 (2d Dist. 2005) (award of $5.5 million compensatory damages and $50 million punitive damages to smoker who developed lung cancer that metastasized to his brain), consumer fraud claims against “Big Tobacco” had experienced rough sledding in both the federal and state courts. By “consumer fraud,” we can broadly categorize those claims that don’t entail personal injuries for smoking-related ailments.
Subscribe to our RSS